STYLE...... Darkwave, Minimal Wave/Synth
DOWNLOAD in 320kbps / FLAC: https://mp3db.pro/post.php?pid=25342
Tracklist: 1. Shock Cubes (4:56) 2. Night Drive (4:41) 3. Kitchen (5:28) 4. Gunrubber (6:47) 5. Orphans (7:18) 6. Seeing Double (4:09) 7. The Pansistent Hegemony (5:19) 8. Silver Bridge (5:23) 9. Suburban Shrinkage (4:40)

This is a variant of Middlemak that gives:

QWLDG JFOU: NSRTP YHEIA ZXCVB KM,./ 

Colored changes from Qwerty
Middlemak-NH GitHub download.
This was inspired by Northstars placement of H, which I think he got from Nerps.
This is an extraordinary option of Middlemak. Specific details:
1) The most fundamental change is that it puts all the vowels on one hand and most consonants on the other. This maximizes alternating hands (since 75% of all bigrams are between vowels and consonants) while still maintaining a good amount of Qwerty similarity to make it easy to adopt and keep shortcuts the same.
2) Second, this is a pretty impressive reduction in SFB (from Middlemak) by getting rid of NK, KN, NY, NF, and NM (and even AZ). None of those are humongous, but they do add up.
3) It reduces NFBs (from Middlemak). (Explanations on points 3 and 4 get pretty big, the short of it is that it reduces NFBS, massively reduces rolls, and puts in more alternating.) Full details:
3a) Left pinky: being N reduces the ring-to-pinky NFBs even more. WN, SN, and XN are much less common than WA, SA, XA.
3b) Right pinky: being A is slightly worse because it gets rid of the H inside roll. It basically splits the previous HI inside roll to half IA and half AI.
3c) RIght index: being H reduces NFB by replacing ON with OH.
4) It massively reduces rolls, replacing them with alternating hands. Full details:
4a) Left pinky: being N reduces overall rolls with the pinky by a massive 53%. The inside rolls reduce significantly, and the outside rolls to N go to almost nil.
4b) Right hand pinky: being A reduces overall rolls with the pinky by slight 11%. There is an increase in outside rolls with the pinky (previously having H there meant there was basically no outside rolls).
4c) Right index: being H reduces overall rolls with the index by 45%. There is also an increase in outside rolls (because H to vowels is common), but the reduction from removing N is huge.
Added up the three letters on both hands and it’s an impressive 43% reduction in overall rolls.
5) I expect this would reduce pinballing even more, because H is less common than N in the middle of words and in-between vowels.
6) Putting H, as the sole common consonant, on the same hand with the vowels works very well. H has half its bigrams with vowels and half with consonants, so putting it with the vowels means ~half the bigrams are on the opposite hand. That’s not as high as the vowels (86% of bigrams with consonants), but it’s quite high all things considered.
7) This still maintains a good amount of Qwerty similarity. Not just the ZXCV, but pretty much the whole bottom row of ZXCVB_M,.? including the punctuation. On the top row it keeps QW in the same spots. On the middle row it still “keeps” part of the SRT order. The letters TG and NYJ switch on the same finger as well. I think Qwerty similarity can’t be overlooked to make it easier to learn.
Downsides:
1) It introduces ND and NG on the same hand. These really don’t feel too bad going from pinky to index inside roll. And this is pretty small considering the amount of rolls taken out.
2) The hands are a little more unbalanced, with the right hand doing a bit more. But it’s very reasonable and still more balanced than most layouts. There’s no changing that without moving one of the uncommon letters Q, Z, X, V to the vowel hand, which would create knock on changes and likely result in a full change layout.
Conclusion:
I think this is a great option to maximize efficiency with most vowels and consonants on opposite hands.
(I do find it interesting that my variant changes 3 letters on the homerow. Most variants change letters around the edges.)

Quick thoughts on other layout’s O and centre column NFBs.

One of the issues with putting O on the middle-finger-upper-row is that the EO column has a ton of frequency that pairs with the centre column. Think of Colemak’s HE, but now you have an O as well. I think you have to be careful or they will add up pretty quick.
Middlemak (and Middlemak-NH) I specifically put less common bigrams (OY and OK) on the center column. These are also low with E.
Canary(ansi): There are a ton of NFBs with O and the centre column with OF and OM. Canary ortho still has a lot with OM on its centre column.
CTGAP(final/5) has similar NFBs with O and the centre column compared to Middlemak.
MTGAP is top notch in this regard by putting punctuation on the centre column. Very low pairings.
Nerps has a notable handful more than Middlemak with BO/OB. Not huge but not nothing.
(APTv3 doesn’t have the O on the middle finger. Putting O on the ring-finger-upper-row pushes the NFBs further away but imo puts O in a weaker position.)
If people really want I can put in charts for this. Have them in excel but it’s a lot of data.

Quick thoughts on columns

A lot of these layouts share similar columns. For consonants RL, TD, SW. Many vowel clusters are similar. A lot seems to come down to the C and what to do with it. It’s interesting to see Canary put C essentially by itself, which means 4 common letters are put off the homerow. Nerps and CTGAP make SCW. APTv3 makes SC.
Moving on, I’ll add some breakdown charts:

Hand balance

Hand balance is a difficult topic. The two most obvious metrics for hand dominance are 1) the frequency of the letters, and 2) the distance the fingers have to travel (which is different from frequency because you don't travel to the home-row). But any pinballing from having too many vowels and consonants on the same hand doesn’t show up in those numbers. Having said that, I’m going to look at frequency and distance.

Keyboard	Vowel Hand	Dominant Hand	Hand Balance ratio based on Frequency	Hand Balance ratio based on Distance	Hand Balance ratio based on Frequency and Distance	Corrected comparison number for left hand dominant
QWERTY	n/a	Left	0.77	1.06	0.82	1.22
Norman	n/a	Right	0.93	1.27	1.19
Beakl-15	Left	Right	1.07	1.48	1.59
Workman	Right	Left	0.97	0.82	0.80	1.26
Dvorak	Left	Right	1.23	1.86	2.30
Middlemak	Right	Right	1.05	1.06	1.11
Colemak	Right	Right	1.14	1.15	1.32
MiddlemakNH	Right	Right	1.11	1.04	1.15
MTGAP	Left	Right	1.00	1.43	1.43
Nerps(ansi)	Right	Right	1.06	0.98	1.04
Engram	Left	Right	1.09	1.43	1.56
CTGAP(final/5)	Right	Right	1.16	1.23	1.43
APTv3	Right	Right	1.11	1.01	1.12
Canary(ansi)	Right	Right	1.30	1.29	1.68

Notes: Sorted by SFB count (see next chart). Ratio >1 indicates right hand dominant, <1 indicates left hand dominant. The hand balance ratios are based on each hand's frequency/distance, right hand divided by left hand. E.g. Middlemak: 51.2% right hand frequency divided by 48.8% left hand frequency equals 1.05. Colemak: 53.2% right hand frequency divided by 46.7% left hand frequency equals 1.14. Hand Balance ratio based on Frequency and Distance is a simple multiplication of the two ratios. I did this because having more frequency and more movement on the same hand amplifies the hand dominance. Or if one hand has more frequency and the other hand has more movement, that would mitigate it to some degree. This is by no means the most definitive way to look at it, but it's what I've managed to come up with. The "Corrected comparison number for left hand dominant" is a hard math thing to explain (that I hope I'm right about anyway). E.g. for Workman listing 0.80 gives the wrong impression the hand dominance is equivalent to 1.2 (20%). But it's actually 1.26 (26%), obtained from 1/0.796=1.26.

SFB (index finger pressing C)

The SFB of Middlemak is still pretty low, but it does come out a tad higher than Colemak’s. Middlemak-NH comes in lower than Colemak (for index finger pressing C).
I’ve debated how to show this and decided to go with the full nuclear information. Data is from Mayzner revisited in millions (which only has letter bigrams and doesn’t have punctuation data, that’s what the 0’s are).

Keyboard	Total SFB	Left hand SFB	Right hand SFB	L Pinky	L Ring	L Middle	L Index	R Index	R Middle	R Ring	R Pinky
QWERTY	185,270	125,920	59,350	1,105	1,661	54,502	68,651	34,166	3,970	21,214	0
Beakl-15	85,917	33,527	52,390	2	21,580	3,134	8,812	18,927	31,183	2,157	123
Workman	78,147	29,268	48,878	1,105	3,712	2,806	21,645	27,338	5,037	16,503	0
Dvorak	70,570	28,306	42,264	0	31	0	28,275	12,142	16,265	8,229	5,629
Middlemak	44,698	25,806	18,892	1,105	1,661	2,716	20,323	12,415	3,134	3,343	0
Colemak	39,023	23,336	15,687	1,105	1,267	639	20,323	9,831	5,037	819	0
MiddlemakNH	36,570	24,999	11,571	298	1,661	2,716	20,323	5,094	3,134	3,343	0
MTGAP	34,151	14,550	19,601	1,147	339	3,134	9,931	4,629	8,633	5,071	1,267
Nerps(ansi)	34,056	20,038	14,018	76	2,745	1,435	15,783	7,541	3,134	3,343	0
Engram	31,167	19,467	11,700	124	2,628	3,134	13,581	5,922	1,435	2,344	1,999
CTGAP(final/5)	30,915	20,125	10,790	54	437	6,262	13,371	4,314	3,134	3,343	0
APTv3(ansi)	24,947	14,697	10,251	1,227	6,551	1,435	5,484	2,643	5,037	1,751	819
Canary(ansi)	24,537	13,103	11,434	23	2,745	4,528	5,808	4,957	3,134	3,343	0

Notes: This is with index finger pressing C location, how I think most people type. Adding in punctuation the numbers would be higher.
Notes 2: I think some people have misinterpreted what I mean with index pressing C. I mean on the bottom row: Pinky presses Z. Ring presses X. Middle presses nothing. Index presses C, V, B. This is not angle mod, which is: Pinky presses nothing. Ring presses Z. Middle presses X. Index presses C, V, B. Index finger pressing C (not angle) is how I think most people naturally type on a normal ansi keyboard, but it’s hard to know for sure. Most of the time this doesn’t make much of a difference of SFBs. Nerps, APTv3, Canary above have been given as angle mod because that’s what the creators specifically wanted, and it does make a difference. For index pressing C, they go up. Nerps to 38,832, APTv3(ansi) to 30,893. Canary(ansi) to 27,296. On the flip side Middlemak and Middlemak-NH if using the angle mod go down just a tad, not enough to be worth giving numbers. That means Middlemak and Middlemak-NH works for all 3 of index finger pressing C, angle mod, and “proper” ortho typing (Index finger pressing C actually gives the highest SFB count). (I could do yet another chart for 3 total on SFBs, but I think this is enough. Note the ortho chart below for APTv3 and Canary uses their ortho specified layouts.)
Middlemak-NH: This is very impressive and in league with full change layouts. All while keeping Qwerty similarity.
If you want overall percentages with index finger pressing C:

Layout	SFB %
Qwerty	6.264%
Beakl-15	3.575%
Workman	3.053%
Dvorak	2.639%
Middlemak	2.078%
Engram	1.863%
Colemak	1.815%
Middlemak-NH	1.784%
Middlemak(rotate punctuation)	1.614%
APTv3	1.420%
MTGAP	1.247%
Middlemak-NH(rotate punctuation)	1.272%
Nerps(ansi)	1.207%
CTGAP(final/5)	1.142%
Canary(ansi)	1.062%

This is from Colemak-DH analyzer. This is quite a bit different and the differences between them are greater. Engram even switches places. This is from a) different corpus used and b) accounting for punctuation. On a) I used Mayzner Revisited which is a massive 5.6 trillion characters (does not have punctuation or spaces). Not sure what Colemak-DH uses but KLAnext considers 1 million to be big and slow. On b) Mayzner Revisited doesn’t have punctuation. Note that Middlemak doesn’t change punctuation while CTGAP, APTv3, and Canary do change them, presumably to reduce SFBs.
Ok I confirmed the big gap is from punctuation. Changing Middlemaks ,./ to ’,. and ’ to / (like Nerps, CTGAP, similar to Canary) gives dramatically lower SFB%. They are listed as (rotate punctuation). I’ll leave it up to the user to decide if they want to change punctuation.

Ortho SFB

Keyboard	Total SFB	Left hand SFB	Right hand SFB	L Pinky	L Ring	L Middle	L Index	R Index	R Middle	R Ring	R Pinky
QWERTY	195,687	136,337	59,350	1,105	1,661	86,462	47,108	34,166	3,970	21,214	0
Beakl-15	85,917	33,527	52,390	2	21,580	3,134	8,812	18,927	31,183	2,157	123
Workman	79,561	30,682	48,878	1,105	3,712	8,206	17,659	27,338	5,037	16,503	0
Dvorak	70,365	28,101	42,264	0	31	1,591	26,480	12,142	16,265	8,229	5,629
Middlemak	42,816	23,924	18,892	1,105	1,661	14,888	6,270	12,415	3,134	3,343	0
MiddlemakNH	34,687	23,117	11,571	298	1,661	14,888	6,270	5,094	3,134	3,343	0
MTGAP	34,151	14,550	19,601	1,147	339	3,134	9,931	4,629	8,633	5,071	1,267
Nerps(ortho)	33,861	19,843	14,018	254	2,745	1,435	15,410	7,541	3,134	3,343	0
Canary(ortho)	31,034	19,600	11,434	179	2,745	10,897	5,780	4,957	3,134	3,343	0
Engram	30,848	20,036	10,812	124	2,628	6,438	10,846	9,010	1,802	0	0
Colemak	30,032	14,345	15,687	1,105	1,267	5,702	6,270	9,831	5,037	819	0
Hands Down Nue	28,429	17,012	11,416	1,267	5,702	3,773	6,270	10,334	126	819	138
CTGAP(final/5)	27,449	16,659	10,790	54	437	7,826	8,341	4,314	3,134	3,343	0
APTv3(ortho)	22,871	12,620	10,251	1,267	6,551	1,435	3,366	2,643	5,037	1,751	819

Notes: This is with the middle finger pressing C location, “proper” or ortho style. Same data as above.
If you want overall percentages - middle finger pressing C, Ortho style (Data from Colemak-DH analyzer:

Layout	SFB %
Qwerty	6.575%
Beakl-15	3.823%
Workman	3.147%
Dvorak	2.625%
Middlemak	2.160%
Middlemak-NH	1.866%
Engram	1.845%
Colemak	1.669%
Middlemak(rotate punctuation)	1.696%
Middlemak-NH(rotate punctuation)	1.354%
APTv3	1.375%
MTGAP	1.281%
Nerps(ortho)	1.203%
Canary(ortho)	1.070%
CTGAP(final/5)	1.069%
Hands Down Nue	0.949%

This is from Colemak-DH analyzer. Again quite different. It oddly says Middlemak and Middlemak-NH ortho increases, as opposed to what I found that ortho decreases SFB on both based on Mayzner Revisited. It must come down to the data set used, specifically CT vs CR+CL. And the same as above, the differences between them are larger which again may be from changing punctuation.
Same as above, confirmed the big gap is from punctuation. Changing Middlemaks ,./ to ’,. and ’ to / (like Nerps, CTGAP, similar to Canary) gives dramatically lower SFB%. They are listed as (rotate punctuation). I’ll leave it up to the user to decide if they want to change punctuation. It still oddly says ortho version increases.

Pinballing stats

Keyboard	Vowel %	Consonant %	Consonant % minus home row
Beakl-15	100%	HKQJX 7.3%	HKQJX 7.3%
Canary(ansi)	95%	NHMFXZ 29.5%	HMFXZ 18.3%
Dvorak	100%	YPKJXQ 8%	YPKJXQ 8.5%
Middlemak	80%	NMFKJ 20.5%	MFKJ 11.9%
Middlemak-NH	100%	HMFKJ 19.4%	MFKJ 9.3%
CTGAP(final/5)	100%	HDFYKX 25.8	DFYKX 15.6%
APTv3	100%	NLQJZ 18.5%	LQJZ 7.3%
Nerps(ansi)	100%	HFBKZ 17.8%	FBKZ 7.6%
Colemak	80%	NHLMKJ 33.7%	HLMKJ 22.4%
Workman	80%	NLFPKJ 26.5%	LFPKJ 15.2%
MTGAP	100%	NPJQZ 15.0%	PJQZ 3.8%

*I decided to not include H for Middlemak because of the direction that the bigrams go. (Fyi if H was included, the NHMFKJ would be 31%, and the consonant % minus homerow would still be MFKJ 12%.) But the location of H matters because it’s almost always followed by a vowel. Putting H with the rest of the consonants means the pinballing can start there. Putting H alone on the pinky gives an inside roll.
The way I would read this to make probabilities, eg for Middlemak, would be 1.0*0.8*0.205*0.8...= 0.132 vs Colemak of 1.0*0.8*0.337*0.8...= 0.216 for a quadgram. For a pentagram: Middlemak would be 1.0*0.8*0.205*0.8*0.205 = 0.0269 vs Colemak of 1.0*0.8*0.337*0.8...= 0.0727. You can keep going. Starting with 1.0 to establish the word starts with the consonant on the vowel hand.
There are issues with this, it's based on frequency rather than actual specific _gram information or words.
The Consonant % minus home row is given because the home row is easier to type on. The consonants that are not on home-row are more awkward to move to.
There are more charts at middlemak/wiki that breakdown all the finger distances, frequencies, etc. Very interesting to see if you are concerned about specific finger workload.

Whenever I download a gamecube or wii rom on vimms lair, it downloads as a nonzippable file. I can't unzip it with 7zip and can't open it on dolphin. Does anyone know how I can solve this?

I have been battling a zip file for the past three hours. I’ve tried to use Chrome, Firefox and Edge to no avail. The file is 26 mbs and the time left is constantly jumping from two days down to 15 minutes. It barely gets to 6 mbs downloaded and says “Failed - Network error” every single time.
PLEASE help

Trying again because reddit filters, let's see if I get it right this time.
After months of scraping I finally finished downloading almost every single degruyter book to which I have access, which are many. And so I created a torrent.

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:76f573241a0126fb1ab0aa5540cc7493c045ae74&dn=Degruyter%20Imprints%20v2%20%5b09-06-23%5d&tr=http%3a%2f%2fatrack.pow7.com%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2fopen.stealth.si%3a80%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.cyberia.is%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2fretracker.lanta-net.ru%3a2710%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.moeking.me%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.tiny-vps.com%3a6969%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3a451%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3a80%2fannounce&tr=http%3a%2f%2ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3a80%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2fopentra 

The content of the torrent is pretty much these https://www.degruyter.com/search?query=*&startItem=0&pageSize=10&sortBy=mostrecent&documentVisibility=all&documentTypeFacet=book&publisherFacet=De+Gruyter%7EDe+Gruyter+Oldenbourg%7EDe+Gruyter+Saur%7EDe+Gruyter+Mouton
Neither the files nor the series are renamed. They all bear the original filenaming which is much better since it can easily be keyed to the book's unique page.
Note: this torrent includes only the abovementioned degruyter imprints. In the upcoming weeks I will create a second torrent, with the degruyter partner publishers: about 100k books from these publishers
https://i.imgur.com/mSKrLto.png And in few months the last torrent which will include the degruyter journals.
This endeavour would have not been possible were not for all the people that granted me academic access, wrote scripts for me, helped me ensure the integrity of the files, and so on. Sadly many files, especially epubs, are corrupted or downright missing at the source. There are also some dupes that, being part of multiple series and subseries, were downloaded twice. Total torrent size is about 2tb.
https://i.imgur.com/BjqsUqJ.png of course everything is actively being shared with nexus/annas/libgen as well as private groups and friends and the classicist discord channel. I did not waste months so I could jerkoff on the big numbah, therefore I want the files to be shared and reshared as much as possible in order to grant indirect academic access to all those students (me being one) whose universities cannot afford degruyter subscriptions.
Last note: all the files are retail untouched (according to BIB standards, if anyone here is a member). So if some epub has shitty formatting blame the publisher.
edit: fixed magnet url

Adobe Premiere Pro 2022 v22.6 Crack MacOS (Apple’s Silicon M1 and M2 Processors) (100% Working)
​

Adobe Premiere Pro 2022 Mac Full Crack v22.6 Free

Adobe Premiere Pro 2022 Mac Free Download Full Crack – This software provides you with thousands of professional video editing features and essential tools. You can easily edit, add music, create transitions and even export any video. Importing into Premiere Pro is possible with almost every popular video format such as h264, h265, mov, avi, wmv. It also works well on the latest MacOS. All of its features has no limitations.
Follow instructions carefully
Instructions For Mac :
to avoid errors like system compatibility report or error code 195 or quit unexpectedly mac applications , INCOMPATIBLE M1 or M2, If ​​you have Chip M1 or M2 use the following instructions to Install Adobe After Effects on Chip M1 or M2 and more follow those instructions.
Attention 😱 ! Before you start install process you should first install Adobe Flash Player 2023 ✅ Latest version to do not face any future issues while using Adobe Premiere Pro also to accelerate graphics rendering.
▶️ Open the link by using Safari :
Download Now
or
🧹 Clean first your mac before installing Adobe Premiere Pro
🍏 For everyone who can’t install Adobe Premiere Pro on Mac and to overcome applications errors you should first Clean your Mac Before you Install it.

• Many security, privacy, and performance features
• Integrated VPN
• ID Theft Guard reveals passwords exposed in a data breach
• Speedy on-demand malware scan
• Simple antitheft protection
• All-inclusive premium services available

Free Version Download Link : Download Now
​
😍 Support us guys and help to grow this community :
You can donate by using Paypal ☑️ or Debit or Credit card users 💳 : https://ko-fi.com/vopiapps
​
The Premiere Pro 2022 Mac includes new additions and enhancements to almost every aspect. The most powerful updates include Scene Edit Detection, Premiere Pro Speech To Text, Quick Export, 4K Video Stabilization speed, and many more. Performance and stability are also prioritized in the new update. As a proof, now video editing many sequences at once is no longer as heavy as in the previous version. Would you like to try it? Download Adobe Premiere Pro 2022 Mac Full Version.

Adobe Premiere Pro 2022 Mac Full Crack v22.6

Installer DMG v22.6 Uptobox Bayfiles DirectLink
File Size : 2.4 GB
Follow me here For More :
- For softwares keys crack patch : https://t.me/windowsmacapps & https://t.me/adobe2020crack
- For Free Premium accounts : https://t.me/deepwebworlds
- Enjooooy.
​

How to Install Adobe Premiere Pro 2022 MacOS Full

1. Download Adobe Premiere Pro 2022 Full Crack
2. Please Disable SIP and Allow Apps From Anywhere
3. Unzip the downloaded file to the desktop
4. Run the installation as usual
5. Follow the Crack instructions according to step number
6. Alternative: Try software patch with Adobe Zii Patcher
7. Enjoy bro…!!!

Adobe Zii Patcher v7.0 Uptobox Mediafire Zippyshare
Adobe Zii Patcher 5.3.2 Uptobox Mediafire File-upload
​
How to Install Adobe Zii Patcher MacOS

1. Download and Unzip the program as usual
2. You need to Disable SIP dan Allow Apps From Anywhere
3. Open the DMG file that appears
4. Run a program
5. Click the Patch button, and wait for the process to finish
6. After successfully closed
7. Enjoy bro!

​

Adobe Premiere Pro 2022 MacOS v22.6 New Features

• A ton of advanced features and tools for video editing
• The ability to do Cut, Edit, Trim and Audio Editing at the same time
• Export video files to 8K resolution and higher
• Import virtually any video format into the software
• Adobe Sensei Auto Reframe for social media
• Adding more effects and transition libraries
• Password : www.yasir252.com
• Improved hardware acceleration on some default effects plugins
• Essential graphics panel in Premiere is now much faster
• Using layer stack system for video editing
• New Quick Export feature that is easier to use
• H264 playback is now 30% faster than previous versions
• Supports the latest MacOS Monterey

Today is the pre download date for the PS5, but it hasn’t began downloading on my console. Anyone have the same issue or did theirs begin?